<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Learning? Me? But I&#8217;m An Expert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hackification.com/2009/05/05/learning-me-but-im-an-expert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hackification.com/2009/05/05/learning-me-but-im-an-expert/</link>
	<description>Rediscover the joy of coding.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 03:07:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joequincy</title>
		<link>http://www.hackification.com/2009/05/05/learning-me-but-im-an-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-4006</link>
		<dc:creator>Joequincy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackification.com/?p=167#comment-4006</guid>
		<description>I always love it when someone brings quotes like these up.

1.) Circa 1948, there WAS only a world market for about 5 computers.

2.) This quote would only fit if your &quot;Take it from these guys:&quot; was intended seriously, instead of sarcastically. The speaker was emphasizing the same point as you.

3.) This is frequently brought up... but always the source is cited as a nameless engineer.
Firstly, entry-level techs at IBM still gain the title &quot;engineer&quot; in certain departments. Are you going to laugh at a company because a lower-level tech didn&#039;t understand a groundbreaking technology?
Secondly, can you guarantee that this quote is indeed an honest quote, and not a fabrication? Countless quotes have later been proven to be complete fabrications meant to convince a target audience to side with the speaker/author. They also frequently share the trait of having a nameless underling as the source.
Thirdly, many presentations include, as an attention-grabbing technique, a challenge question such as this (What is it good for? This is what it&#039;s good for!)... Taking this statement at face value without any context is inappropriate.

4.) Once again, circa 1977, there WASN&#039;T a reason for an individual to own a computer in their home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always love it when someone brings quotes like these up.</p>
<p>1.) Circa 1948, there WAS only a world market for about 5 computers.</p>
<p>2.) This quote would only fit if your &#8220;Take it from these guys:&#8221; was intended seriously, instead of sarcastically. The speaker was emphasizing the same point as you.</p>
<p>3.) This is frequently brought up&#8230; but always the source is cited as a nameless engineer.<br />
Firstly, entry-level techs at IBM still gain the title &#8220;engineer&#8221; in certain departments. Are you going to laugh at a company because a lower-level tech didn&#8217;t understand a groundbreaking technology?<br />
Secondly, can you guarantee that this quote is indeed an honest quote, and not a fabrication? Countless quotes have later been proven to be complete fabrications meant to convince a target audience to side with the speaker/author. They also frequently share the trait of having a nameless underling as the source.<br />
Thirdly, many presentations include, as an attention-grabbing technique, a challenge question such as this (What is it good for? This is what it&#8217;s good for!)&#8230; Taking this statement at face value without any context is inappropriate.</p>
<p>4.) Once again, circa 1977, there WASN&#8217;T a reason for an individual to own a computer in their home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skrapasor</title>
		<link>http://www.hackification.com/2009/05/05/learning-me-but-im-an-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-4005</link>
		<dc:creator>skrapasor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackification.com/?p=167#comment-4005</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get what the quotes are supposed to mean... are you saying that these people were ignorant? Clearly they were pioneers of computing, so what are you saying? These people were geniuses in their fields, completely learned from I&#039;m sure technical books as well as experimentation, so what I got out of this post is no matter how much you learn you are going to say things that seem stupid later. The quotes honestly don&#039;t have much relevance to the rest of your post, just because they are both on the subject of ignorance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get what the quotes are supposed to mean&#8230; are you saying that these people were ignorant? Clearly they were pioneers of computing, so what are you saying? These people were geniuses in their fields, completely learned from I&#8217;m sure technical books as well as experimentation, so what I got out of this post is no matter how much you learn you are going to say things that seem stupid later. The quotes honestly don&#8217;t have much relevance to the rest of your post, just because they are both on the subject of ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Stricker</title>
		<link>http://www.hackification.com/2009/05/05/learning-me-but-im-an-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-4004</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Stricker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackification.com/?p=167#comment-4004</guid>
		<description>Anyone working in a technology related field should make part of their job staying up to date on what is next.  Because advances in technology come so quickly if you are not constantly learning, you and your knowledge will become obsolete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone working in a technology related field should make part of their job staying up to date on what is next.  Because advances in technology come so quickly if you are not constantly learning, you and your knowledge will become obsolete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dzhariy</title>
		<link>http://www.hackification.com/2009/05/05/learning-me-but-im-an-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-4003</link>
		<dc:creator>dzhariy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackification.com/?p=167#comment-4003</guid>
		<description>I have translated this article into Russian. Thanks for wise thoughts. 
Please, see: http://cs-flow.blogspot.com/2009/05/blog-post.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have translated this article into Russian. Thanks for wise thoughts.<br />
Please, see: <a href="http://cs-flow.blogspot.com/2009/05/blog-post.html" rel="nofollow">http://cs-flow.blogspot.com/2009/05/blog-post.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.hackification.com/2009/05/05/learning-me-but-im-an-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-4002</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackification.com/?p=167#comment-4002</guid>
		<description>Cool, I mostly see books as increasingly irrelevant for learning programing and internet technology, so was somewhat surprised to see you use it as an analogy.  

That being said, that&#039;s because most tech books are how-to or into details, APIs, etc that change quickly with time.  Other books the Dragon Compiler book for example, are much more timeless, as they tech concepts and ways of thinking that aren&#039;t closely tied to the underlying implementation -- these are the ones worth reading IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, I mostly see books as increasingly irrelevant for learning programing and internet technology, so was somewhat surprised to see you use it as an analogy.  </p>
<p>That being said, that&#8217;s because most tech books are how-to or into details, APIs, etc that change quickly with time.  Other books the Dragon Compiler book for example, are much more timeless, as they tech concepts and ways of thinking that aren&#8217;t closely tied to the underlying implementation &#8212; these are the ones worth reading IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stusmith</title>
		<link>http://www.hackification.com/2009/05/05/learning-me-but-im-an-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-4001</link>
		<dc:creator>stusmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 19:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackification.com/?p=167#comment-4001</guid>
		<description>True, books are &quot;out of date&quot;. My point is that many developers don&#039;t even read out-of-date books.

Blogs and other web-based articles are just as good IMO. I subscribe to over a hundred blogs - I don&#039;t read them all in depth obviously, but I scan for articles of interest.

I&#039;ve got a book lined up for my holiday (off tomorrow) - Beautiful Architecture - and I&#039;m learning jQuery, which has no direct relevance. Look through my ray-tracing articles - I doubt they&#039;ll ever be of importance to my work - but I did all that for fun.

Having said that, my diatribes are mainly aimed at myself - I don&#039;t do enough off-topic reading - that&#039;s just my writing style, writing about myself, but as if to a third person.

(PS to all commenters - I won&#039;t be able to approve comments for a week - please don&#039;t assume you&#039;ve been spam-blocked!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, books are &#8220;out of date&#8221;. My point is that many developers don&#8217;t even read out-of-date books.</p>
<p>Blogs and other web-based articles are just as good IMO. I subscribe to over a hundred blogs &#8211; I don&#8217;t read them all in depth obviously, but I scan for articles of interest.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a book lined up for my holiday (off tomorrow) &#8211; Beautiful Architecture &#8211; and I&#8217;m learning jQuery, which has no direct relevance. Look through my ray-tracing articles &#8211; I doubt they&#8217;ll ever be of importance to my work &#8211; but I did all that for fun.</p>
<p>Having said that, my diatribes are mainly aimed at myself &#8211; I don&#8217;t do enough off-topic reading &#8211; that&#8217;s just my writing style, writing about myself, but as if to a third person.</p>
<p>(PS to all commenters &#8211; I won&#8217;t be able to approve comments for a week &#8211; please don&#8217;t assume you&#8217;ve been spam-blocked!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.hackification.com/2009/05/05/learning-me-but-im-an-expert/comment-page-1/#comment-4000</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hackification.com/?p=167#comment-4000</guid>
		<description>When a book comes out it&#039;s information is almost always a year or so old ... 

When was the last time you read a technical blog post, article, or code documentation when it was of no immediate use to your job?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a book comes out it&#8217;s information is almost always a year or so old &#8230; </p>
<p>When was the last time you read a technical blog post, article, or code documentation when it was of no immediate use to your job?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
